Legal Opinion
Mil-Tech Systems, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 3, 1984No. 221-84CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Plaintiff Mil-Tech Systems, Incorporated (“Mil-Tech”), seeks declaratory and injunc-tive relief, inter alia, prohibiting the United States Army, by its Communications-Electronics Command (the “Army”), from awarding the contract for 62,000 AS-1729/YRC antennas under Invitation for Bids No. DAAB07-83-B-B030 (the “IFB”) to any entity other than Mil-Tech. The parties reduced their positions to cross-motions for summary judgment upon which argument has been heard. The issue of first impression is whether the contracting officer, in the absence of a statute or regulation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Harris Data Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DLM & A, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Lyons Security Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Medical Devices of Fall River, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989