Legal Opinion
Harris Data Communications, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 6, 1983No. 83-83CPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Plaintiff Harris Data Communications, Inc. (“Harris”), filed its motion for a preliminary injunction on February 18, 1983, accompanied by a complaint for a declaratory judgment that the Automatic Data Processing Selection Office (“ADPSO”) of the United States Department of the Navy violated applicable federal procurement regulations by determining that Harris’ proposal in response to Request for Proposal No. 66032-82-R-0011 (the “RFP”) was unacceptable and by excluding it from further competition. Harris alleged that ADSPO wrongfully failed both to advise Harris of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- CCL Service Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.