Nur v. State

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Mustafa Nur appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

Issues

We restate the issues as follows:

I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying Nur’s motion for a new trial based on the trial court’s failure to provide Nur with an interpreter; and

II. Whether the trial court committed reversible error in allowing a paralegal from the public defender’s office to speak with the deputy prosecutor prior to Nur’s hearing on his motion for a new trial.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to the judgment are as follows. On May…