Legal Opinion

The State of New Hampshire v. Thomas Jur

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 8, 2014No. 2013-075PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Thomas Jur, was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while certified as a habitual offender. RSA 262:23 (Supp. 2012). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Delker, J.) erred by denying his pretrial request for an interpreter, thus violating his right to a fair trial and effective assistance of counsel under both the State and Federal Constitutions. In the alternative, the defendant argues that the trial court’s failure to appoint an interpreter at trial sua sponte was error. We affirm.

I

The pertinent facts are as follows. In February 2012, the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  4. United States v. Serge EdouardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Pablo MayansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Ismail Yaman and Linda YamanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. State v. Patrick EschenbrennerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API