Smylie v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Introduction
In this appeal and several similar cases, the defendants challenge the constitutionality of their sentences under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). The U.S. Supreme Court's latest word on the constitutionality of sentencing schemes is just eight weeks old. United States v. Booker, -- U.S. --, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
Attempting to take account of both Blakely and Booker, we hold today that portions of Indiana's sentencing scheme violate the Sixth Amendment's right to *682trial by jury, and that the new rule…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by217 opinions
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Anglemyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.