United States v. Orlando Vasquez Carrion
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant, convicted of knowingly aiding and abetting the distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, contends that his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were abridged during trial because (1) the court allowed into evidence impermissible and prejudicial hearsay, (2) appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel, and (3) the court refused to appoint an interpreter for him.
The first claim is clearly lacking in merit. Even assuming that the statements were not admissible under the theory of joint venture, the court granted a motion to strike them and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States of America Ex Rel. Rogelio Nieves Negron v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Samuel Sosa and Julio ArgumedoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. Serge EdouardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Pablo MayansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Jose S. Chacon v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.