Legal Opinion

Lomax v. Rowe

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1928No. 3481PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). We think it ought to he said it appeared without dispute in the evidence having probative force that the vacancy existed as claimed by appellant. While bearing trees called for in the patents had long ago disappeared, the location on the ground of the southwest corner of the Thomas Anderson survey on the east boundary line of the W. A. Pressley survey (No. 37) was well known, as was the location of the southeast corner of said Anderson survey. It was undisputed in the evidence, that, while the call in the field notes of the Anderson was for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Booth v. UpshurTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Booth v. StripplemanTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Hamilton v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Goodson v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Lafferty v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Blake v. Pure Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API