Legal Opinion
Varsam v. Laboratory Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 3, 2015No. Case No. 14cv2719 BTM (JMA)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief. Judge.
On November 24, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the 'Complaint in its entirety under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and a motion to strike under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.,-Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 3, 2014, Plaintiff commenced this action ip the Superior Court of California,'County of San Diego. Plaintiff is suing on behalf, of herself-and a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Byrd v. Masonite Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Abboud v. Circle K Stores IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Amaro v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Arrington v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2025
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.