Williams v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, C. J.
There being only four judges as members of this Supreme Court at the present time since the recent resignation of Achor, J., Rakestraw, J. and Arterburn, C. J. are of the opinion that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed, while Myers and Jackson, JJ. are of the opinion that the decision of the trial court should be reversed and the appellant granted a new trial.
The four judges participating being equally divided at the last term of court (Achor, J. not then participating), and being still equally divided at this term, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed without costs.
Acts…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Jackson; Concurrence · Arterburn.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- PAXTON v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Hammond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re the Annexation Proposed By Annexation Ordinance Number X-06-91Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- PAXTON v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.