PAXTON v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
Arterburn, J.
I must dissent from the majority opinion because I think it leads to an absurd result.
The appellants were charged by affidavits for the crime of theft and second degree burglary. The charges were filed in separate affidavits and subsequently consolidated and tried *279together before a jury. The verdict of the jury was guilty of each charge against each appellant.
The essential question on this appeal revolves around the arrest of the appellants and the contention that the subsequent search based on the arrest was illegal and that, therefore, the evidence obtained…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- PAXTON v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
- Neely v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960