Legal Opinion
In Re Dawson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 24, 1928No. 18802PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
This action involves the validity of a zoning ordinance of Oklahoma City, and was brought under the provisions of House Bill No. 204, chapter 178, Session Laws of 1023, relating to the powers of municipal corporations to r'egulate and restrict the location and use of buildings. It originated in the board of adjustment of the city of Oklahoma City, created under authority of said act known as the “Zoning Law,” and came before that board on appeal from the decision and determination of the building commissioner of Oklahoma City. The commissioner refused to issue a permit for the use of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Junge's Appeal. (No. 1.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Stevens v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Anderson-Kerr, Inc. v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.