Legal Opinion
Tulsa Rock Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 1975No. 46128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROMANG, Judge:
Tulsa Rock Company, which was the plaintiff in both actions and is the appellant here, will be termed Tulsa Rock.
The Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County, Oklahoma, which was the defendant in both actions and an appellee here, will be termed the defendant or defendant Board.
Bill Kirby and others, who were allowed to intervene in both actions and are appel-lees here, will be termed the intervenors.
Tulsa Rock Company, which mines or quarries local limestone rock deposits and supplies the crushed limestone to various Tulsa area construction, concrete, and paving…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Radice v. People of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Marblehead Land Co. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Houston v. Board of City CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- R.H. Gump Revocable Trust v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Chiavola v. Village of OakwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977