Chestnut Hill Co. v. City of Snohomish
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcGovern, J.
Appellants prosecute this appeal from an order dismissing a writ of certiorari directed to the city of Snohomish and its city council following the enactment of that city’s ordinance No. 987. The result of the ordinance was a zone classification of R-2 for appellants’ property, thus permitting the operation of a nursing home thereon subject to a conditional use permit. Appellants sought an R-3 classification which would have allowed them to operate the home without the necessity of a permit.
Prior to purchase by the appellants in the year 1955, the property involved in this proceeding was used…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Barrie v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Standard Mining & Development Corp. v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Lange v. Town of WoodwayWashington Supreme Court · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.