Legal Opinion

Chestnut Hill Co. v. City of Snohomish

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1969No. 39750PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGovern, J.

Appellants prosecute this appeal from an order dismissing a writ of certiorari directed to the city of Snohomish and its city council following the enactment of that city’s ordinance No. 987. The result of the ordinance was a zone classification of R-2 for appellants’ property, thus permitting the operation of a nursing home thereon subject to a conditional use permit. Appellants sought an R-3 classification which would have allowed them to operate the home without the necessity of a permit.

Prior to purchase by the appellants in the year 1955, the property involved in this proceeding was used…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. Myhre v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Barrie v. Kitsap CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Standard Mining & Development Corp. v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Lange v. Town of WoodwayWashington Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API