State v. Isaacson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
Appellant Richard Isaacson appeals a trial court order resentencing him to consecutive terms when the original sentence left unspecified whether the sentence was consecutive or concurrent. We agree with appellant’s contentions and reverse.
FACTS
Appellant pleaded guilty in St. Louis County in Virginia, Minnesota, for violating Minn.Stat. § 169.129 (1986) for driving while under the influence while his license was revoked because of a prior D.W.I. This was a gross misdemeanor offense. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report. The report indicated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ennis v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. RockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Moffitt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. MeechCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tauer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. RasinskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995