Legal Opinion

State v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 8, 1999No. 16131-5-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

— Ted Louis Bradford was convicted of first degree rape and first degree burglary. On appeal, Mr. Bradford contends the court erred in admitting statements he made to police officers during an interrogation that was commenced while he was in custody on other charges. Mr. Bradford asserts the statements were obtained in violation of his rights under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and article I, section 9, of the Washington Constitution. Mr. Bradford further contends the State violated CrRLJ 3.2.1(d)(1) by unilaterally rescheduling his arraignment…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. JaquezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. State v. JaquezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. In Re BradfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of BradfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State Of Washington v. Joseph Anthony BallouCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API