Legal Opinion

In Re Bradford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 14, 2007No. 24448-2-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

165 P.3d 31 (2007)

In re the Personal Restraint of Ted Louis BRADFORD, Petitioner.

No. 24448-2-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

August 14, 2007.

Jacqueline Mc Murtrie, UW Law Clinic-Innocence Project NW, Felix G. Luna, Peterson Young Putra, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Kevin Gregory Eilmes, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Yakima, WA, for Respondent.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 We grant the personal restraint petition of Ted Louis Bradford and reverse his 1996 rape and burglary convictions based upon newly discovered DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence. Considering the disputed evidence, we agree…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of BrettWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re BrettWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Riofta v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. RioftaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bedingfield v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API