Legal Opinion

State v. Jaquez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 6, 2001No. 24896-4-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

20 P.3d 1035 (2001)

105 Wash.App. 699

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Pepe JAQUEZ, Appellant.

No. 24896-4-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

April 6, 2001.

Linda J. King, Court Appointed, Steilacoom, for Appellant.

Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Deputy Pros. Atty., Tacoma, for Respondent.

HUNT, A.C.J.

Pepe Jaquez appeals a jury conviction for first degree robbery with a deadly weapon enhancement. We hold (1) that the trial court erroneously allowed Jaquez to be shackled during trial without first determining that restraint was necessary and (2) that such action prejudiced Jaquez' right…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V William Edward LundstromCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. State v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API