Legal Opinion

Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pacific Northwest Power Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 18, 1963No. Civ. No. 62-110PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

This is an action for a Declaratory Judgment, in which each party asks for a Summary Judgment. The plaintiff asks that the court adjudicate and declare:

1. That subject to the requirements of the Federal Power Act (Title 16 U.S. C. A. Ch. 12) the plaintiff is authorized under the laws of the State of Washington, particularly ROW Ch. 43.52, to construct either the Nez Perce or High Mountain Sheep Project, each of which is more particularly described in Exhibit A attached to plaintiff’s complaint.

2. That the Federal Power Act authorizes the Federal Power Commission (FPC)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. DeGrief v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washington Public Power Supply System, a Municipal Corporation v. Pacific Northwest Power Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. SohnDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1997
  3. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1998
  4. In re Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In re Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API