Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports

Decided November 30, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Brian Sonntag Washington State Auditor Legislative Building P.O. Box 40021 Olympia, WA. 98540-0021

Dear Mr. Sonntag:

By letter previously acknowledged, you have asked for our legal opinion on several questions relating to the authority of public utility districts (PUDs).1 In seeking our opinion on these issues, you indicate that the competitive environment in which PUDs operate is changing and that the potential for increased competition in the electrical utility field is contributing to expanded services and activities offered and contemplated by some PUDs. Comments submitted on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Port of Seattle v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hite v. Public Utility District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API