Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re Washington Public Power Supply System
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1963No. 36708Published
1DissentWeaver, J.
(dissenting)—I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion which states:
“Whether it [WPPSS] has, as a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, the power and authority to construct and operate such a project [Nez Perce or High Mountain Sheep dams between Oregon and Idaho] is not before the court and is not here passed upon.” (Italics mine.)
I believe the question is before this court. If we do not recognize and pass upon it, we will, in the almost predictable future, be confronted with the argument that the question is res judicata.
The fourth unnumbered paragraph of ROW 43.52.360…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lauterbach v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Walsh v. WolffWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pacific Northwest Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1963