Legal Opinion
United States v. Sohn
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 5, 1997No. Civil No.97-868-JOPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge:
Defendants Edward Sohn, Gerard Sohn, Howard Sohn, Mark Sohn and Richard Sohn are general partners of Suntip Company, an Oregon general partnership. This court entered judgment of $32,582,717.00 against Suntip in October 1996 in connection with Suntip’s default on nine timber contracts it had entered into with the United States. United States v. Suntip Co., No. CV 93-681-JO, Order dated October 7, 1993.
After collecting $2,973,448.16 from Suntip’s surety and then determining that Suntip is unable to satisfy the remaining balance, the United…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Gilligan v. Jamco Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Richard J. Moriarty and Gruber, Moriarty, Fricke & JarosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sunseri v. ProctorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Pratt v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001