Legal Opinion

Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp. Commission

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1984No. 14651PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOSA, Senior Justice.

The New Mexico State Corporation Commission (Commission) refused to grant a common carrier’s Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (Certificate) as requested by Groendyke Transport, Inc. (Groendyke). Groendyke challenged the Commission’s order in an appellate hearing before the First Judicial District Court. The district court affirmed and Groendyke appeals. We affirm.

In July, 1981, Groendyke applied fee a Certificate for a grant of authority to operate a statewide service as a motor common carrier of property under the then controlling New Mexico Motor…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Llano, Inc. v. Southern Union Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Santa Fe Exploration Co. v. Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zamora v. Village of Ruidoso DownsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gallup Westside Development, LLC v. City of GallupNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API