Holt Manufacturing Co. v. Odenrider
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Neal, J., entered November 23, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
On the 22d day of April, 1908, the defendant gave the plaintiff a written order directing it to manufacture a combined harvester and ship it to him at Almira Station, in this state. The order stipulated that the defendant “agrees not to countermand this order except for failure of crops prior to the date of shipment, . . . and it is understood *556and agreed that all stipulations, agreements, and warranties entered into between the respective parties are embodied in this contract, and no agent has any power to make any additions to or to vary the terms and conditions hereof.” The machine was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koons v. St. Louis Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Roberts v. Pacific & A. Ry. & Navigation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- Grunwald v. FreeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Denney v. StoutNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Taussig v. Southern Mill & Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schuster v. North American Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921
- Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953