Denney v. Stout
Nebraska Supreme Court
• Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Soott, J. cited: Billings v. McCoy Bros., 5 Nebr., 187; Dell v. Oppenheimer, 9 Nebr., 454; Gandy v. Pool, 14 Nebr., 98; Sahduñch Mfg. Co. v. Shiley, 15 Nebr., 109; First Hat. Banh v. Carson, 30 Nebr., 104. cited Prall v. Peters, 32 Nebr., 832; St. Felix v. Green, 34 Nebr., 800; Smith v. Wigton, 35 Nebr., 460.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
This action was commenced in the county court of Douglas county and was removed thence to the district court by appeal. The petition stated a cause of action for money expended by the plaintiff, Peter S. Stout, at the request of Denney and O’Neill, and for their use and benefit. The answer was a general denial. A jury found the issues in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered on the verdict. There is in the brief of counsel for the complaining party no extended discussion of the errors assigned, but it would seem that the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Jack Mann Chevrolet Co. v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Lee v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Cowen Co. v. Houck Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Titterington v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. O'RourkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.