Grunwald v. Freese
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. Action by Fritz Grunwald and Otto Munch, partners under the firm name of H. C. Morf & Co. against William Freese. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SEARLS, C.
This appeal is prosecuted by the defendant from a final judgment in favor of plaintiffs and comes up on a bill of exceptions. The action was brought by plaintiffs, *183factors and commission merchants at Yokohama and Hiogo, in the empire of Japan, to recover from the defendant, a merchant, in the city and county of San Francisco, $4,999.60 Mexican dollars, of the value of $4.149.67 gold coin of the United States, a balance due on a mutual, open, and current account, with interest, etc. For some time prior to 1888 defendant had shipped from San Francisco to plaintiffs in Japan, for sale…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Benners v. ClemensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Alfonso v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1843
- Upper San Joaquin Irrigating Canal Co. v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Page v. LevensonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1922
- Pecaflor Construction, Inc. v. LandesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Bacciglieri v. Charles C. Meek Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Compania Engraw Commercial E. Industrial S. A. v. Schenley Distillers Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. OdenriderWashington Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.