Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Hanover Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1968No. Civ. 24902PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
The plaintiff-appellant M. Frank Carroll brought this action against the defendant-respondent Hanover Insurance Company to recover attorney’s fees alleged to be due him under a policy of insurance issued by Hanover. The superior court sustained Hanover’s demurrer to the complaint, without leave to amend. The notice of appeal states that the appeal is taken from the order sustaining the demurrer, but no appeal lies from such an order. (Kennedy v. Owen, 85 Cal.App.2d 517 [193 P.2d 141], and eases cited; 3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (1954) Appeal, §19, p. 2162.) Such an order contemplates the later…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Jarrett v. AllState InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Friendly Village Community Ass'n v. Silva & Hill Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Previews, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. California Union Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.