Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Lyons
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is an action of contract by the indorsee before maturity and holder for value of a negotiable promissory note against the makers. The note fell due on October 1,1920, and was payable to one Swartz, who indorsed it in blank. The genuineness of all signatures was admitted or proved. It was agreed that the commissioner of banks took possession of the plaintiff trust company on September 25, 1920, and had no authority on October 1, 1920, from any Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court *120authorizing the compromise of any claims against the trust company, and that his representative had the same…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Simpson v. City of MarlboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Bachrach v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Way v. GreerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Boston Electric Co. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Barnett v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rossi Bros. v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Suffolk Knitting MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Eastern Advertising Co. v. Standard Nut Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. S. Vorenberg Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Commissioner of Banks v. T. C. Lee & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.