Legal Opinion
Rossi Bros. v. Commissioner of Banks
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 24, 1933PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff seeks to have the defendant instructed to apply certain deposits to its credit in the Highland Trust Company, of which the defendant is in *116possession under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 167, §§ 22-36, for purposes of liquidation, to the payment in part of promissory notes held by the defendant, signed by the plaintiff as maker, and indorsed by two other persons. The defendant seeks by way of affirmative relief that the indebtedness of the plaintiff to the bank be determined and that the plaintiff be ordered to pay the same.
When the defendant took possession of the bank on October 13,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Union Trust Co. v. McGintyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Savage v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Bachrach v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Another v. Brookline Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- T.F. v. B.L.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Beauvais v. Springfield Institution for SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Forastiere v. Springfield Institution For SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Lonergan v. Highland Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Krinsky v. Pilgrim Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.