Legal Opinion

Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. Suffolk Knitting Mills

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are two actions at law. The first is brought by the Cosmopolitan Trust Company to recover on a note made to its order by the Suffolk Knitting Mills, first discounted in its commercial department but later sold to its savings department and paid for at face value with funds of that department. No question is made as to the' liability of the knitting mills on its note. Confessedly judgment ought to be entered for the trust company for the full amount due on the note.

The commissioner of banks on September 25, 1920, took possession of the property and business of the trust company by virtue…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Cunningham v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Godfrey v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Rossi Bros. v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API