Legal Opinion

Bihn v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1946No. 675PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

Petitioner and one Bennett were convicted of a conspiracy 1 to violate the statute and regulations governing the rationing of gasoline.2 It was charged that between July 1, 1943 and September 6, 1944 petitioner would steal gasoline ration coupons from the First National Bank of Poughkeepsie, New York, where she was employed, transfer them to Bennett, and share with Bennett the *635proceeds of the sale. The case was tried to a jury. Petitioner alone appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals, which sustained the judgment of conviction, one judge dissenting. 152 F. 2d 342. The sole question presented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. State v. AdkissonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. Billeci v. United States. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  5. Ronald Maurice Stump v. John Bennett, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary, Fort Madison, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API