Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Temple View Investments

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 26, 2003No. 20030050-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*656OPINION

JACKSON, Presiding Judge:

T1 Appellant Wells Fargo Bank (Wells Fargo) appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment to Appellees Temple View Investments, and its principals Greg Stuart (Stuart), Willliam D'Evelyn (D'Evelyn), and Richard Bennion (Bennion), collectively referred to herein as Temple View. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 Wells Fargo brought an action for breach of contract against Temple View on May 15, 2002. The action is based on a promissory note dated November 1, 1985, in the principal amount of $339,232.80, executed by Temple View. In 1991, Wells Fargo filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gorostieta v. ParkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Schaerrer v. Stewart's Plaza Pharmacy, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Conatser v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Burns v. SummerhaysCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Deutsche Bank National TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. Bradsen v. Shellpoint Mortgage ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Valdez v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API