Bach v. Forever Living Products U.S., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS’ TRADEMARK CLAIMS
PECHMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment denying Plaintiffs’ trademark claims. (Dkt. No. 69). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. (Dkt. No. 76). Having considered the parties’ briefs, including the supplemental briefs, (Dkt. Nos. 125 & 129), as well as all of the documents submitted in support thereof, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion. The Court also DENIES Defendants’ motion to exclude the expert survey of Kenneth Hollander. (Dkt. No. 82).
BACKG…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Surowiec v. Capital Title Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. BrewerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Craigslist Inc. v. 3taps Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Lions Gate Entertainment Inc. v. TD Ameritrade Services Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Wild Fish Conservancy v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. AgencyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.