Legal Opinion
Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 28, 2016No. 16-101CPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-award bid protest; HUD asset-management contracts for three geographic areas; awards based upon a trade-off between past performance ratings and price; challenge to past performance ratings; adequacy and fairness of discussions with offerors within the competitive range; FAR § 15.306(d)
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
This post-award bid protest arises from a solicitation by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD” or “government”) for contracts in twelve geographic areas to market and sell single-family homes acquired by HUD after the owners defaulted on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Mercom, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.