Legal Opinion
Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 27, 2017No. 16-101CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-.award bid protest; motion for relief from judgment; RCFC 60(b); post-deci-sional change in circumstances; standing; application of Tinton Falls
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
The court issued its decision on the administrative record in this post-award bid protest on April 20, 2016. See Q Integrated Cos., LLC v. United States, 126 Fed.Cl. 124 (2016), appeal dismissed, No. 2016-1991, — Fed.Appx. -, 2016 WL 4363180 (Fed. Cir. June 2, 2016). In the procurement at issue, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD” or “government”) solicited and awarded contracts for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Sage Acquisitions LLC v. HudCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Guzman v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.