Legal Opinion
Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 5, 2017No. 16-101CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Trial court’s jurisdiction over a case after an appeal has heen filed
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Pending before the court are plaintiffs application for bid preparation and proposal costs (“bid costs”), ECP No. 82, and plaintiffs motion for attorneys’ fees and related nontaxable expenses (“attorneys’ fees”), EOF No. 90, the latter of which has been filed invoking the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). The application and motion are premised upon the court’s partial grant of Q Integrated’s motion for judgment on the administrative record on April 20, 2016,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- A Squared Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Adsync Technologies, Inc. v. FAA (PUBLIC REISSUED)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026
- BRADLEY v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Criterion Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.