Legal Opinion

Balderas v. Starks

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 25, 2006No. Case No. 20041111-CAPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

¶ 1 Appellant Ricardo Balderas appeals the trial court’s refusal to order additur or grant a new trial after the jury awarded less in damages than he sought. He also appeals the trial court’s admission of testimony from an expert accident reconstructionist retained by Appellee Joseph Starks. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 On January 1, 2001, Starks’s Mazda MX-6 rear-ended Balderas’s Chrysler New Yorker at a low speed in an icy parking lot. Balderas exited the vehicle after the collision and told Starks that he had been in a prior rear-end accident. Balderas’s vehicle sustained…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. KelleyUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. West Valley City v. Majestic Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  2. KTM Health Care Inc. v. SG Nursing Home LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. State v. MaeseCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. Welsh v. Hospital Corp. of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. Florez v. Schindler Elevator Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API