Legal Opinion

Kaimann v. Goodsitt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The weight to be given to conflicting evidence bearing upon testamentary capacity is for the trial court. The party contesting a will because of alleged lack of testamentary capacity has the burden of proving the incapacity by clear and satisfactory evidence. Estate of Knutson (1957), 275 Wis. 380, 82 N. W. (2d) 196. It is elementary that the question of competency is to be determined as of the time of the execution of the will. Id. Findings of fact by a trial court are not to be set aside unless they are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence and where there is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. H. Clark Co. v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Guldhaug v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Fillar v. Estate of FillarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Meier v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Larson v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fuhrman v. FuhrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Matter of Estate of BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Estate of Dobrecevich v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Rahr v. East Wisconsin Trustee Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API