Legal Opinion

Guldhaug v. Martin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1957PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

In a careful and thorough opinion the county court held that on the date the will was executed testatrix possessed testamentary capacity to make a will, that the will was not the result of undue influence, and that it was properly executed. Formal findings of fact to that effect were made. On examination of the record we are satisfied that none of the essential findings is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence, and that therefore the judgment admitting the will to probate must be affirmed. Indeed we consider that the trial court’s findings are clearly supported…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Schaefer v. ZiebellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gevers v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Estate of ScherrerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Estate of FullerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Estate of BrehmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Estate of McGonigalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Estate of O'LoughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Valley Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API