Legal Opinion

Rahr v. East Wisconsin Trustee Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1979No. 76-268PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, C. J.

The challenge to the order admitting the will and the codicils to probate is primarily upon the grounds (1) that the testatrix lacked sufficient mental capacity to make a will, and (2) that the will and the codicils were the product of undue influence.

The objectors to the will and codicils were Eileen Rahr, widow of decedent’s nephew Paul, and Pauline Marie Rahr, grandniece of the testatrix and principal surviving beneficiary under an earlier will dated August 18, 1969.

Blanche Fechter, the testatrix, died on February 10, 1976, at the age of eighty-eight years, possessing an estate worth in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Matter of Estate of BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cooper v. ZoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Estate of PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Estate of KomarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. First National Bank of Appleton v. NennigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Estate of Sensenbrenner v. SensenbrennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ozaukee Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. S. S. Z. (In re S.S.Z.)Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API