Legal Opinion

Fillar v. Estate of Fillar

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1960PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The present proceeding to discover assets of a deceased person and to procure from the county court an appropriate order when such a discovery is made is authorized by sec. 312.06, Stats.

By a finding of ultimate fact (finding 18) the county court determined:

“(18) That George Filiar exercised undue influence upon his father, John Filiar, in securing the sum of $5,830.33 from said John Filiar and that said sum is an asset of the estate of John Filiar, deceased.”

The judgment ordered George Filiar to make restitution of $5,830.33 to the estate of John Filiar. George Filiar appeals, contending…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cole v. GetzingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Davis v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Boardman v. LorentzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Estate of LarsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kuehn v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Guinther v. SchuchtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Nehls v. NehlsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API