Shrimpton & Sons v. Rosenbaum
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo; Buck, J. Assumpsit by Alfred Shrimpton & Sons (a corporation) against Simon Rosenbaum and others for goods sold. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
The facts of this case are similar to those in Shrimpton & Sons v. Netzorg, 104 Mich. 225; and the principal questions raised here are ruled by the decision in that case.
The order was printed, leaving spaces as to quantities and dates, and containing blanks of which the following are copies:
One of the inducements held out was that the plaintiff was to print, upon the card containing the hooks and eyes, *70defendants’ advertisement. Just before the signature, printed in smaller type, were the words: “When ready, ship by the cheapest way.” Defendants’ testimony was that plaintiff’s agent first…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- French v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Alfred Shrimpton & Sons, Ltd. v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yanelli v. LittlejohnMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Gardner v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Jordan v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Radloff v. Ruggles Motor Truck Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Alfred Shrimpton & Sons Ltd. v. EschwegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896