Legal Opinion

French v. Ryan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1895PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) ■ Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts ■are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This suit is brought upon a promissory note of $5,000, made by John Eyan, indorsed by •James- Eyan, and given in payment for a subscription to *627stock in the Port Austin Manufacturing Company,, a corporation. The defense is fraud and misrepresentation respecting the business to which the corporation succeeded, •and concerning the parties who were to join in the new ■enterprise and the amount of capital which had been secured. The fact that Mark Carrington is the real owner ■of the note is not seriously .questioned.

Thomas Winsor and his father-in-law, Mark Carrington, had for some years been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beebe v. KnappMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Keithley v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kilgore v. BruceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. McDonald v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bareham & McFarland, Inc. v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API