Legal Opinion

Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. Heitz

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 4, 2007No. Civil 06-366 (DWF/SRN)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FRANK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Lincoln Benefit Life Company (“Lincoln”) initiated this interpleader action against Brenda Kay Heitz, formerly known as Brenda Kay Caswell, (“Heitz”) and Claudine Starkey, as Administrator of the Estate of Dirk W. Caswell, (the “Estate”) to resolve a dispute over who is the rightful beneficiary to proceeds from a life insurance policy. This matter came before the Court, pursuant to Heitz’s and the Estate’s Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Heitz’s motion and grants the Estate’s motion.

BA…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. StorsveSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mony Life Insurance v. EricsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  3. Barker v. County of LyonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API