Legal Opinion
Barker v. County of Lyon
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 2012No. A11-1746PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.*
Appellants, present or former employees, brought this action alleging claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, declaratory judgment, and unconstitutional impairment against respondents, a county and its board of commissioners. Respondents moved for summary judgment on all of appellants’ claims, and the district court granted summary judgment dismissing all the claims. Appellants challenge the dismissal of their promissory estoppel and unconstitutional impairment-of-contract claims.1
FACTS
This case results from successive changes made by respondent Lyon County…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Office Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Transport Drivers, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018