Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. WCB 90-21435; CA A72995; SC S41202PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) erred in dismissing claimant’s request for a hearing regarding insurer’s refusal to pay for palliative medical care. The Court of Appeals held that the Board did not err, because ORS 656.245(1)(b) and ORS 656.704(3) grant to the director of the Department of Insurance and Finance 1 exclusive authority to resolve a dispute over an insurer’s refusal to pay for palliative care. Therefore, according to the court, the Board had no authority to resolve the dispute. Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 553,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hathaway v. Health Future EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit & Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kenfield v. Health Future, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API