Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit & Saif Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
The issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) erred in dismissing claimant’s request for a hearing regarding insurer’s refusal to approve palliative medical care under ORS eSG^éSllXb).1 The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board’s conclusion that the palliative care dispute was not a “question concerning a claim,” under ORS 656.283(1),2 because the approval procedure for palliative care in ORS 656.245(1)(b) was the exclusive procedure for obtaining that care. Therefore, according to the court, under the last sentence of ORS 656.704(3),3 the Board had no jurisdiction…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Hathaway v. Health Future EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Hathaway v. Health Future EnterprisesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Nicholson v. Salem Area TransitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3Cited by2 opinions
- Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995