Legal Opinion
Lookholder v. State Highway Commissioner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1958No. Docket 38, Calendar 47,523PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
To review condemnation proceedings instituted under PA 1925, No 352, as amended (CL 1948, § 213.171 et seq. [Stat Ann and Stat Ann 1957 Cum Supp §8.171 et seq.]), appellants sued out— in the Kalamazoo circuit—certiorari to the State highway commissioner. The writ, following due trial, was dismissed. Appellants are here with the record by application and grant of leave to appeal.
We granted leave for the purpose of reviewing an asserted denial of due process arising from the appointment of an allegedly interested “person” (see section 28 of the act as added by PA 1927, No 92 [CL 1948, § 213.198…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re Petition of RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Hendershott v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Reh v. ErtrachterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Detroit International Bridge Co. v. Commodities Export Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- State Highway Commission v. L & L Concession Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- City of Detroit v. Whalings, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Spartan Stores, Inc v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.