Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of Rogers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1928No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 33,504PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Several landowners review, by certiorari, proceedings to condemn their lands in the townships of Ecorse and Brownstown, Wayne county, for the purpose of a public highway.

For the sake of brevity we will consider the case of Frederick W. Boelter, who owns a farm of 82 acres in the township of Ecorse, having a frontage of 160 rods on the West road and 84 rods on the Telegraph road, both being paved highways. The proposed road cuts through Mr. Boelter’s farm diagonally, taking 3.938 acres, and leaving 8.44 acres on the west and the rest of the farm on the south of the highway. April 1, 1927, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hendershott v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Schenectady Railway Co. v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. In Re Petition of State Highway CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Pueblo v. 632 Metros Cuadrados de TerrenoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. Wampler v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Detroit International Bridge Co. v. Commodities Export Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API