Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Interlake Sporting Ass'n v. Washington State Boundary Review Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2006No. 78578-3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*548¶1

J.M. Johnson, J.

Property owners Interlake Sporting Association, Inc., and Gerald K. Hirschler (Interlake) appeal a King County Superior Court decision affirming a decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County (BRB). The BRB’s decision required the city of Redmond to annex a 184-acre area — more than three times the size of the 58.96-acre area defined in the petition for annexation signed by affected property owners and approved by Redmond ordinance. Interlake owns private property in the area which would not have been annexed under the filed petition. Interlake…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Interlake Sporting Ass'n v. BRBWashington Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API