Legal Opinion

McCornick v. United States Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1911No. Nos. 3,291, 3,293PublishedCited by 8 opinions

. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Utah. Action by the United States Mining Company against W. S. Mc-Cornick and another.

1Opinion of the Court

WM. H. MUNGER, District Judge.

In June, 1902, the United States Mining Company (a corporation) commenced an action in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Utah against Leonidas M. Lawson and others, to quiet its title to certain named mining claims in Salt Lake county, state of Utah, which mining claims were in the possession of said United States Mining Company. Such proceedings were had in said action that in March, 1903, a decree was made and entered by said court, dismissing the action at the cost of plain*749tiff. From that decree plaintiff duly prosecuted an appeal to this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Callaway Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Coosaw Min. Co. v. Carolina Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Chicago Life Ins. v. TiernanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. v. Story Parchment Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
  4. Carr v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939
  5. Davis v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API